) 2 SCR 680 is a le……"> Miller v R について
翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Miller Township
・ Miller Township, Dearborn County, Indiana
・ Miller Township, Hand County, South Dakota
・ Miller Township, Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania
・ Miller Township, Knox County, Nebraska
・ Miller Township, Knox County, Ohio
・ Miller Township, LaSalle County, Illinois
・ Miller Township, Pennsylvania
・ Miller Township, Perry County, Pennsylvania
・ Miller Transit
・ Miller Trunk Corridor
・ Miller twist rule
・ Miller v Jackson
・ Miller v Janks
・ Miller v Miller
Miller v R
・ Miller v. Alabama
・ Miller v. Albright
・ Miller v. Arizona Corporation Commission
・ Miller v. California
・ Miller v. Campbell
・ Miller v. Commissioner
・ Miller v. Davis
・ Miller v. Jenkins
・ Miller v. Johnson
・ Miller v. Korns
・ Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.
・ Miller v. Schoene
・ Miller v. Skumanick
・ Miller v. United States


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Miller v R : ウィキペディア英語版
Miller v R
''Miller v R'' () 2 SCR 680 is a leading Canadian Bill of Rights decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where the Criminal Code provisions relating to the death penalty were challenged as a violation of the right against "cruel and unusual" punishment under section 2(b) of the Bill of Rights.
Justice Laskin, for the majority, upheld the laws. He interpreted the phrase "cruel and unusual" in the context of its origin in the English Bill of Rights and the US Eighth Amendment, which only limited the means of carrying out a death sentence.
Some of the definition given to cruel and unusual punishments in this case later shaped the jurisprudence carried out under section 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
==See also==

* List of Supreme Court of Canada cases

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Miller v R」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.